Ria Kj

Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have until February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand employment in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to take leave and be paid till completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment lawyer who represents federal workers as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s delayed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I actually don’t consider it so much an offer. I think it’s a demand to resign with an unclear pledge that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative leave status for approximately 8 months – but no guarantees.MARTIN: employment Some people have been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is because there seems to be the offer of administrative leave for as much as 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would absolutely not describe it as a buyout. I think that’s a really misleading term to utilize in this scenario. When you think about a buyout, there’s normally some sort of written agreement or a concrete offer to supply an advantage in exchange for waiving particular rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your recommendations, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is workout extreme care. There are no assurances consisted of in this email. The only thing I can inform you for certain is that if you alter your mind, the company’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some category of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most mindful since leaving earlier than meant can have major consequences, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is an excellent deal for individuals who don’t want to go back to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal employees that they have to return in – to work. And employment if they don’t, employment then they have the choice to resign, and employment this administration is extremely generously using to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just – in a manner, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s designed to get folks who work really to resign. I think it’s trying to pull the wool over a great deal of individuals’s eyes since there are no warranties. And employment these are individuals who like their task. They enjoy the mission of the company. They work hard. And right now, they’re facing extremely tough choices, especially if they’re remote. I suggest, it’s extremely coercive.MARTIN: You say it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who lives in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you prepare for legal obstacles just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be honest, is so unprecedented that I believe a great deal of us are still trying to determine what to do with it. I’m not exactly sure if the offer itself might be challengeable. I think the bigger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not conscious of any authority that exists today for OPM to purchase firms to provide this number of people administrative leave. So I think it is quite potentially setting the phase for obstacles since I feel OPM has actually significantly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for joining us.BERCOVICI: employment Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our site terms of use and approvals pages at www.npr.org for further info.

NPR records are produced on a rush deadline by an NPR specialist. This text might not be in its last kind and may be upgraded or revised in the future. Accuracy and schedule may vary. The reliable record of NPR’s shows is the audio record.